Before Covid Injections, Know Its Science

You have a Covid drug injection decision to make.
Science can help you make it.
This eBook doesn't address vaccine politics, pro or con. Its sole focus is basic science and science education.
This eBook is a plain-English story of how both leading Covid drugs failed Phase 3 drug trials.
Drug-makers claimed 94-95% effectiveness against Covid disease.
Unfortunately, neither trial withstands scientific scrutiny.
The failure of these 2 drug trials is so basic, every American can--and should--understand it.
The eBook walks you through facts and steps to show how both drug trials failed the basic-science "double-blind" standard.
Experimental design is scholarly science, though its basics are simple enough for fifth-graders to understand, presented here.
Results of this plain-English science review are shocking and profound.
The problem is simple.
In a single-blind drug experiment, participants don't know whether they got the drug or the placebo (saltwater injection here).
In a double-blind drug experiment, health-care providers don't know either.
Here, participants and providers knew the drug likely produced flu symptoms because the required Consent Form, and
supporting Protocol, told them.
The saltwater (saline) placebo doesn't usually produce flu symptoms.
Injectees getting flu symptoms could figure out they likely got the drug.
Injectees not getting flu symptoms could figure out they likely got saltwater.
Thus, the participant side of double-blind failed quickly.
Required daily symptom reports enabled doctors, nurses, and staff to figure out who likely got the drug and who didn't.
Double-blind provider side also failed quickly.
Drug experiments are double-blind to rule-out competing explanations for results.
Double-blind failures introduce new participant and provider behaviors that become competing explanations for results.

These competing explanations prevent any causal statements about drug effectiveness.
Claiming a drug prevents a disease requires scientists to rule out competing explanations before making a causal statement like "our drug prevented ovid disease".
Both companies failed to do so here.
The unavoidable conclusion is that both experiments hopelessly confounded dozens of competing explanations by using saline as the placebo, which caused major double-blind failures.
That makes the 94-5% drug effectiveness claims scientifically invalid.
Simply put, Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna failed to present solid scientific evidence that either drug is effective--for anything, because both Phase 3 trials were obvious double-blind failures.
The burden of proof for mass injections of this new class of genetic drugs, using messenger RNA, is understandably high.
Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna didn't even meet the low bar of basic scientific standards for double-blind experiments.
This eBook uses simple, conversational English to explain these earthquake discoveries.
Unlike the year of Covid drug news that we've all suffered through, there's no "Trust Us" here.
Real science is publicly verifiable.
You can publicly verify all facts and reasoning steps here.
You decide if facts are true, and reasoning is sound.
Remarkably, you can verify both with 4 CNBC and CNN participant reports that showed how double-blind failed.
Double-blind failures were obvious, yet ignored like an elephant in the room.
Bottom line. There's no solid scientific evidence to support mass injections of either drug.
Every American should read this eBook before Covid injections to inform a decision.
Consider buying copies for friends.

Dettagli