Is a dialogue between Jews, Christians and Muslims possible?

In your hands the elements for common ground in dialogue and present perspectives and responses to obstacles, criticisms and pastoral keys to interreligious dialogue from multiple perspectives.

Here we present ways of reflection in the face of its obstacles, offering common elements in order to present the proposal of interreligious dialogue from ethical monotheism in an independent, comparative and mutually constructive way in which the understanding, experience and presentation of each monotheism is carried out within a community with its own tradition and revelation and at the same time in dialogue with otherness.

It includes a new exploration of unity and monotheism from languages, praxis and dialogue in the relationship with each tradition from areas not so explored in theology such as its relationship with politics, violence and fundamentalism, as well as atheism, polytheism and idolatry.

In the book of Deuteronomy, the Gospel according to Mark, along with surah 112 of the Quranic text, in a comparative and non-confessional manner you will find the advances of modern language research and analyses of the Torah (), the Gospel () and the Quran () in their original languages, as well as modern interpretations.

It is undoubtedly a tool to go further in biblical and Qur'anic studies, and to delve in situ into biblical exegesis and Qur'anic interpretation within each culture, language and Tradition, something you will not find in other books.

The dialogue between Christians, Jews and Muslims has often been marked by controversy and apology although their communities have lived together for centuries, hence the need to build bridges for the knowledge of religions, the understanding of their theologies and, more importantly, to coordinate the practices of their communities in relation to each other; therefore, detailed, comprehensive and comparative readings are presented from the language, exegesis and theology of each revelation, to present a novel proposal in its method and scope.

Dettagli