You are Viewing a Summary of the Content from the book. "The Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism " The Contents of the Summary are not written to replace the Original book but rather to provide viewers with better understanding of the book in a more easy and comprehensive manner.
"The Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism" by retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer is a thought-provoking exploration of the fundamental principles and methodologies that underpin constitutional interpretation. Through insightful analysis and compelling case studies, Breyer examines the contrasting approaches of pragmatism and textualism, offering a nuanced perspective on the role of the judiciary in shaping legal principles and societal values. With clarity and depth, Breyer invites readers to reconsider prevailing assumptions about constitutional adjudication and encourages a reevaluation of the balance between fidelity to legal texts and responsiveness to evolving societal norms. A timely and essential read for scholars, practitioners, and anyone interested in the intricate workings of the American legal system.