'Who was Anton Wilhelm Amo?' - 'Remapping the Jungle' vs. 'Vom faulen Holze lebend'?!

Document from the year 2009 in the subject Philosophy - Practical (Ethics, Aesthetics, Culture, Nature, Right, ...), University of Vienna (Institut fur Rechtsphilosophie, Religions- und Kulturrecht), course: Wider das Vergessen! - Kritische Beitrage junger RechtswissenschafterInnen?, language: English, abstract: Karl LARENZ (jun) - a 'famous prime father' of German legal science (, as e.g. judge Prof Dr Thomas HOEREN put it in the - basically - highy-quality newspaper 'FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG'? Immanuel KANT - a 'world master' of thinking (, as e.g. GRABNER-HAIDER/WEINKE put it)? - E.g. WIMMER, FIRLA, HENTGES et al cast doubt on the 'mode' of presenting e.g. students (almost) 'semi-divine' (?) legal thinkers, often not even mentioning any of their pseudo-scientific research. Should holocaust-implications not at least cause a 'stir' (of critical re-thinking) the mode of presenting 'viri 'boni''?

Dettagli